North-Queensland man beats DUI charge with surprising defence

North-Queensland man beats DUI charge with surprising defence

A CAIRNS man’s drink-driving charge was overturned when a Judge found he consumed liquor after leaving the scene of a crash.

In the unusual case, which appeared in the Queensland District Court, just less than 10 years ago, it was established the man drove off after running into a Japanese tourist on a bike.

The crash was relatively minor and there was no evidence the cyclist was hurt – with witnesses saying the damage was mostly to the bike.

Get in touch to speak to one of our lawyers

In the wake of the crash the man accused of drink-driving got back in his car, drove home and drank the remainder of a bottle of sparkling wine which he had opened before going out.

He then started drinking a second bottle.

Soon afterwards police arrived and undertook a breath test – which returned a reading of 0.152 per cent – more than three times the legal limit.

Sign up to our free newsletter

Under Queensland Law police can breathalyse a person they suspect of drink-driving up two hours after they have gotten out of the car.

The man’s friend, who was over for dinner, backed up his testimony that he’d only drunk one glass of wine before ducking out to the shops to get extra ingredients.

Click the links below to read other stories on our blog:

>>Are speed cameras accurate? When police lose in court

>>Crazy legal way your ex can come after your assets

>>Five things you should know before posting on social media

>> Your rights if police stop you for a random drug search

>>The 11 things you should know before getting a divorce

When the case went before a Magistrate the man’s testimony was not accepted and he was found guilty and convicted.

However, the conviction impacted his ability to work as a commercial driver and some six-years after initially appearing in the Magistrate’s Court the man appealed.

On appeal the Judge found there was not enough evidence to discount the man’s testimony  that he was not drunk when he was driving and his conviction was set aside.

Although a separate conviction for careless driving was upheld.

In another, similar matter, from Townsville, a Judge sent a case back to be heard by a different Magistrate after a man claimed he drank two cans of rum between when he crashed his car and the police arrived.

However, in that case before the matter was heard by the new Magistrate the man changed his plea to guilty.

 

 

Are speed cameras really accurate? When police lose in court

Are speed cameras really accurate? When police lose in court

Speeding fines are one of those things that are, on face value, very hard to argue with – a police officer uses either a radar or a camera to check how fast you were going and if you’re over the limit – you’re toast.

But one Brisbane man who appealed his fine through the courts showed it is possible to beat the system.

Get in touch and speak to one of our lawyers.

Police used a photographic device – a speed camera – and claimed they pinged the man driving at 73km/h in a 60km/h zone.

The relevant Queensland law states that when police use photographic devices to measure how fast you’re going then they need to have a certificate which shows the camera had been tested within the past year and was accurate.

Click the links below to read the other links on our blog:

>>Man’s surprising defence to drink-driving

>> Your rights if police stop you for a random drug search

>The 11 things you should know before getting a divorce

In the case in question the man initially lost in the Magistrate’s Court but then appealed up to the Queensland District Court with the Judge there finding: “the certificates do not state that the device had been calibrated within the prescribed 12 months.”

And because the certificates which showed the device was accurate weren’t current the Judge said the: “learned magistrate could not have been satisfied beyond reasonable doubt the device being relied upon by the prosecution in this case was producing accurate results.”

It is important to note the law is different for all types of devices and radar and some stationary speed checking equipment are subject to different standards.

Of course, with any speeding fine cost is a factor and a lot of people who insist they were not over the limit let the issue go because appealing can be more expensive than just paying.

Sign up to our free newsletter here.

Ironically, incorrectly calibrated equipment is plausibly more likely to impact those who are only just over the speed-limit meaning innocent people caught by this area of law, often plead guilty.

The fine for exceeding the speed-limit by less than 13km/h presently sits at $175, the Queensland Police Service charge $47.90 for you get a hold of a copy of the calibration certificate and check if it is more than 12 months out of date.

So, while that may be excellent value for money for a person who was allegedly exceeding the speed limit by more than 40km/h – which attracts a $1,219 fine – it is less so for a person facing a smaller penalty.

Five things you should know before posting on social media

Five things you should know before posting on social media

Number One – You can get sued for what you say, even if you say it online

Comments you post online can lead to you being sued for defamation, this includes comments on Facebook. Some solicitors have previously said it often seems as though people making defamatory remarks on social media are oblivious to the fact their actions could land them in court. And in New South Wales defamation laws are being reviewed to reflect the massive changes brought about by social media.

Number Two – Small businesses can sue for things people say that lower their reputation

In Queensland businesses with less than 10 employees can take legal action if they receive a false and defamatory online review. However, if you are posting a negative review and you can prove what you are saying, you will be okayIf you’re a small business owner looking to take-on someone who has left a false, negative review it is worth seeking legal advice.

Click the links below to read the other links on our blog:

>>Man’s surprising defence to drink-driving

>> Your rights if police stop you for a random drug search

>The 11 things you should know before getting a divorce

And sign up to our free newsletter here.

A recent decision from the Queensland courts refused to give damages to a Brisbane-based business owner, who sued over an online review, on the basis that it was in the public interest for people to be able to comment on goods and services they buy. That said, the public interest defence won’t stand if the reviewer knows what they’ve said is false. As such it’s worth considering either getting a lawyer or communicating with the reviewer yourself to ensure the reviewer sees evidence to show, beyond any reasonable doubt, their review does not reflect the truth of what happened.

Number Three – There are legal ways to stop online bullying and harassment

If you feel you are being hounded online, you can seek an injunction from the courts for an order for those involved to stop defaming you. This won’t get you damages although you will still need to prove the material which has been posted was defamatory. However, once the order is in place breaching it can have very serious consequences, including prison.

Number Four – When things go wrong this is how much it can cost

Damages for comments and posts which only harm a person’s reputation but not their business dealings are capped in Queensland at just less than $400,000. In cases where a person can show they have lost money, or their business has lost money, damages can run much higher. In a sequence of recent Victorian judgments actress Rebel Wilson was initially awarded $4.7 million because she showed she had lost acting roles due to defamatory magazine articles about her. This was reduced to $600,000 on appeal – although Ms Wilson has said she will now appeal to the High Court.

Number Five – Sharing it is like saying it and soon you might even be liable for things others say

When you go on Twitter and retweet someone else’s comment, or share it on Facebook, it is likely the courts will view you as being liable for the content of what you passed on. While this question isn’t necessarily settled in Australian law, it is established precedent in the UK. In a similar vein the New South Courts are expected to hand down judgment later this year on a case where several media outlets are being sued over comments members of the public posted on their Facebook pages. That case will centre on whether, or not, the media companies knew, or ought to have known, people would make defamatory remarks about the person who is suing them and whether they should have refrained from posting stories about that person as a result.

Click the links below to read the other links on our blog:

>>Man’s surprising defence to drink-driving

>> Your rights if police stop you for a random drug search

>The 11 things you should know before getting a divorce

And sign up to our free newsletter here.

Man’s surprising defence to drink-driving charge

Man’s surprising defence to drink-driving charge

Most drink-driving cases are essentially open and shut – police breathlyse a person, get a reading above the legal limit and take their licence.

But an exceptional case from Townsville where a Judge accepted that a man had drunk two cans of rum and coke between the time when he crashed his car and when the police arrived, well and truly breaks the mould.

Sign up to our free newsletter for alerts on our blog posts

This story begins early on a summer morning, in 2005, when a man was involved in a car crash at an intersection.

When police arrived on the scene half-an-hour later and breath-tested him they got a reading of 0.181 per cent, more than three times the legal limit.

As a Magistrate who considered the case noted: “normally this would be sufficient to convict” but what the man told police added a fresh twist.

He said that in the time between the car crash and when police arrived he drank two cans of rum and coke.

Click the links below to read other stories on our blog:

>>Five things you should know before posting on social media

>> Your rights if police stop you for a random drug search

>>The 11 things you should know before getting a divorce

There was a witness to the crash who told police she hadn’t seen him drinking and police claimed they couldn’t see any cans lying about.

And when the case first went to court, the Magistrate refused to believe the man’s story.

“I am prepared to accept and find that on the evidence any window of opportunity for the defendant to have consumed any liquor, let alone two cans of alcohol as he has claimed, was in fact miniscule,” the Magistrate found.

The Magistrate also placed weight on the fact the man had not taken to the witness-box in his own defence.

In doing so he engaged with a controversial aspect of the law, which is that people accused of a crime do not have to testify in court.

This is because a person’s right not to incriminate themselves is always given priority.

So, instead of taking to the witness box, they can let their lawyers present their version of events and a judge, or a jury, can’t doubt that evidence, just because it wasn’t said by the person accused of the crime.

Thus, when the case was appealed to the District Court the Judge there noted the Magistrate was wrong to doubt the evidence just because it came from the man’s lawyers.

He also found that while police couldn’t see any empty rum-cans lying about they may have been concealed in the car’s glove-box.

As a consequence, the judge found that the police hadn’t proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the man didn’t drink two cans of rum and coke directly after the crash.

And the Magistrate’s finding was struck down and the case sent back to be heard by someone else.

However when that happened the courts tell us the man involved chose to plead guilty and copped an $1100 fine and had his licence suspended.

The court’s file in this case has been destroyed and it is unclear why the man changed his plea.

The 11 things you should know before getting a divorce

The 11 things you should know before getting a divorce

DIVORCE is a traumatic time for anyone but getting help and taking clear action will save you time, money and let you get on with your life more quickly.

The first thing you need to sort out are your finances and if there are children involved you need to get a parenting agreement.

A key family lawyer at Strategic Lawyers, Robert Ballais, explained the whole process of getting a divorce is best thought of as having two separate parts and three parts if you have children.

“Under Australian law couples actually have to be separated for one full year before they can get a divorce,” Mr Ballais said.

“However, before you get a formal divorce you can work out how you want to divide up all of your assets by getting a property settlement and work out what’s best for the kids through a parenting order.”

In Australia the divorce rate is falling however there are still lengthy waits to access the courts.

It’s also important to note that while de facto couples – people in a relationship who have been living together for two years or more – don’t need to get a divorce, there may still be a need to get a property settlement and a parenting order.

And with the majority of divorces being agreed to by both sides of the marriage Mr Ballais said couples that are able to reach an agreement without a lengthy dispute get quicker, less expensive outcomes.

“Obviously that’s not always possible but our first step is always to try and minimise the pain by sorting everything out and reaching consensus,” he said.

Below he runs through what you’ll need to have at hand to get through each part of the process and gives you the inside running on how you can do the prep-work to save your lawyer’s time and to save your money.

GETTING A PROPERTY SETTLEMENT

1. Work out what you own and what you owe
The best thing people can do before they come in to see a family lawyer is create a document with all the assets and liabilities they have.

This should include things like the mortgage, if you have one and any other loans and how much has been paid and how much is owing.

It should also include details of any other personal loans or assets and any valuations people have for those and one final thing a lot of people forget is to bring details of their superannuation.

2. Know your business
The second thing people will need to bring along if they want to reach a property settlement are any details of any businesses they own.

This really could include any financial document to do with that business but usually things like a valuation would be the most useful.

3. Did you already have an agreement?
In a lot of cases couples have already agreed on how they’re going to split their assets but as Mr Ballais explained this often doesn’t take the form people might expect.

For example, it might be something as simple as a text message or an email from years ago where these things were discussed.

So, having any details of any discussions is a great place to start – regardless of whether the ownership of any of the assets are in dispute.

GETTING A PARENTING ORDER

In the same way people can divide their assets as soon as they separate they are also able to make legal arrangements for the custody of their children.
Below Mr Ballais goes through what you will need to bring along to make sure you have everything you need on hand.

4. Have you already agreed on this?
If you’ve already worked out who is going to take care of the kids and on which days they will have them, then bringing along a copy of that agreement saves a lot of time.

This might have been agreed at an earlier point in time or after you decided to separate.

5. Check your roster
This is especially important for people who do fly in, fly out work – or work shifts.

Sometimes people will go to put an agreement in place only to realise their work arrangements make it impossible, so bringing along your roster from the outset is the best way to avoid any issues.

6. Write out what you want
Before you see a lawyer it’s worth thinking about the custody arrangement you want and writing it down.

If you are able to agree on this it won’t just save your lawyer time, it will save you money as the process for reaching a mutual agreement on custody is a lot less costly than if the matter goes to court because there’s a dispute.

GETTING A DIVORCE

So, you’ve sorted out your property and worked out a parenting order. Now you are ready to finalise your divorce.

Below Mr Ballais explains the legal hoops and hurdles the law puts up for people looking to officially end their marriage.

7. Get counselling & make sure you’ve been separated for 12 months

If there is a chance of reconciliation, the first thing every couple should do is try to work out their problems.

This isn’t just a nicety the Family Law Act actually requires couples who have been together for less than two years to get marriage counselling.

Also under the Family Law Act people need to be separated for 12 months before they can start a divorce application.

Obviously, for people in abusive and extreme circumstances it wouldn’t be necessary or appropriate to force them into counselling and they can apply to the court to avoid the process however, they still need to have been separated for 12 months.

8. Find your marriage certificate
This is one of the first things any family lawyer will ask for at the first meeting

So, having it handy means we can get started straight away instead of having to wait on paperwork.

9. Sit down and write out all your personal details
For the divorce application itself you’ll need the addresses of both parties involved – or the address of their lawyer.

You’ll also need your places and dates of birth and your occupation.

Finally, if you moved to Australia from overseas you will need to state the date on which you moved into the country.

10. Write down all your children’s details
If there are kids involved then a lot of information is required before a divorce application can be finalised.

Mr Ballais explained the most essential items included any child support paid to date, any custody arrangements presently in place and any proposed changes to those custody arrangements.

It’s also useful to have a record of any of the children’s health issues and what schools they currently attend.

11. Find out how much it will cost
Strategic Lawyers was the first firm in North Queensland to offer something called fixed-pricing.

This means we will, wherever possible, tell you how much it will cost to work on your matter and give you a binding quote before we start.

A lot of firms will charge by the hour – creating an incentive for lawyers to waste time and charge you for it.

Here at Strategic we do things differently; we do everything we can to remove the stress created by the uncertainty of not knowing how much your divorce will cost.